Hi Eric, On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is very little chance we'll accept a new member in sk_buff, unless > proven needed.
I actually have no intention of doing this! I'm wondering if there already is a member in sk_buff that moonlights as my desired ttl counter, or if there's another mechanism for avoiding routing loops. I want to work with what's already there, rather than meddling with the innards of important and memory sensitive structures such as sk_buff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
