On 13 November 2015 at 06:46, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't follow the logic. You observed one flow which matched on
>> TTL=64, therefore all vxlan packets terminated at OVS have TTL=64?
>
>> If OVS received packets with different TTLs, they would miss and
>> ovs-vswitchd would generate flows to match that traffic too.
>
> ok, that makes things a bit better, but (see next)
>
>> If that becomes an issue, presumably the wildcard generation can be improved.
>
> is there a deep reason for vlxan "learned flows" to actually match w
> or w.o wild cards on TTLs?? for non-tunneled flow I don't see  this
> happening.

No deep reason I'm aware of.

>> I agree that this UNSPEC issue on v2.3 could do with a bit of a closer
>> look. I'll see if I can find some time for it. Alternatively if you're
>> willing and have bandwith, I'd be curious if it's related to the
>> masked set field feature introduced in Linux-4.0.
>
> so what would you suggest here? run with 3.19 or earlier?

On second thought, I think if it were related to that then userspace
v2.4 would not exhibit the problem. I'd have to dig in to see why it
occurs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to