On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Shi, Yang <yang....@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/9/2015 12:00 PM, Z Lim wrote: >> >> How about splitting this into two patches? One for the BPF-related >> bug, and another for A64 FP-handling. > > I'm not sure if this is a good approach or not. IMHO, they are kind of > atomic. Without A64 FP-handling, that fix looks incomplete and introduces > another problem (stack backtrace). >
The first, even on its own, doesn't make things worse, only better. The second, which we agree needs to be fixed also, addresses a different issue. Either way, please also note that these patches fix the original implementation. We do want -stable to pick these up. Suggestions for the diagram: - As an enhancement, would you mind showing the A64_FP also? - Please revisit "+64:" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
