From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:53:24 +0300
> Hello. > > On 11/5/2015 4:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > >>> While the ring allocation is done by a single function, >>> sh_eth_ring_init(), >>> the ring deallocation was split into two functions (almost always >>> called >>> one after the other) for no good reason. Merge >>> sh_eth_free_dma_buffer() >>> into sh_eth_ring_free() which allows us to save space not only on the >>> direct calls of the former function but also on the >>> sh_eth_ring_init()'s >>> simplified error path... >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> >> >> Applied. > > Hum, I'm seeing both patches in the net.git repo, while they were > clearly targeted to net-next.git... Did you really consider these 2 > patches fixes? It was more work for me to let the patches rot in patchwork until I openned net-next back up than to simply just apply them to net. You guys really make an enormous amount of work and stress for me when you submit net-next patches when I _CLEARLY_ and _EXPLICITLY_ state that the tree is closed right now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
