On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Vostrikov Andrey
<andrey.vostri...@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>>> > About the parity -- can we add some flag into the datagram to indicate we
>>> > want hardware to calculate the parity for that particular datagram for
>>> > us? And we'd also need to indicate what type of parity. I dunno if this
>>> > is worth the hassle.
>>>
>>> This  is HW configuration property, it does not belong to  datagram. Also
>>> for TX channels,  parity could  be  two  kinds:  odd and even, for RX it
>>> is only on/off.
>
>> There are datagrams which do contain parity and ones which do not contain it,
>> correct ? Thus, it's a property of that particular datagram.

All ARINC words have bit #31 as parity bit; whether it's used or not
depends on the setup as Andrey says below.

> For   RX  side  it  is  both: datagram and HW (is it checked by receiver or 
> not)
> But  for TX side it is HW property of transmitter, either OFF or ON (odd or 
> even).




-- 
Aleksander
https://aleksander.es
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to