On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, before your changes, the qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 0) would
> have been useless, since qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen() does nothing in this
> case [1]
>
> But after your changes, we need to change the backlog, even if the qlen
> does not change.
>
> Maybe I missed something, but your patch is not really obvious ;)
>

Oh, very good point... You actually mean in some cases we enqueue
one packet and then drop one packet which ends up with dropping 0
packet but the backlog size goes down by (drop_len - enqueue_len). :)

Hmm, I need to double check for this case for sure, but for sfq case,
I just did:

-       qdisc_tree_decrease_qlen(sch, 1);
+       qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1, dropped);

which isn't the case where n==0, like you mentioned.

I am auditing that case for all the qdisc's anyway.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to