On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing > > framework > > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch > > (series) > > you submitted to intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > > > > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass, > > and might be > > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may > > not be > > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a > > default kernel > > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch. > > > > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai > > has detected a > > false positive, please email Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com > > >. > > False positive. > > As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly > longer > delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not > harmful. > > Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose. > > Regards, > Peter Hurley
Feel free to ignore this then. Regards, JakeN�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+���z�^�)����w*jg��������ݢj/���z�ޖ��2�ޙ����&�)ߡ�a�����G���h��j:+v���w��٥