On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:52 +0000, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Unfortunately Hadoop isn't the only thing that pulls the shutdown()
> trick, so I don't think there's a simple fix for this, as discussed
> earlier in the thread. Having said that, if close() on Linux also did an
> implicit shutdown() it would mean that well-written applications that
> handled the scoping, sharing and reuse of FDs properly could just call
> close() and have it work the same way across *NIX platforms.
Are non multi threaded applications considered well written ?
listener = socket(...);
bind(listener, ...);
listen(fd, 10000);
Loop 1 10
if (fork() == 0)
do_accept(listener)
Now if a child does a close(listener), or is killed, you propose that it
does an implicit shutdown() and all other children no longer can
accept() ?
Surely you did not gave all details on how it is really working.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
