On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:53:07PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > Good point. No, I don't. Any suggestions? > > > I can try to just re-target -nf tree (sans patch #2). Pablo? > > > > The smallest change seems to be adding the nf_ct_frag6_consume_orig() > > call to OVS, plus the morph logic from patch 3. Alternatively if Pablo > > is fine with having the series re-targeted, then that sounds > > reasonable to me too. > > Pablo, your call. > > I would suggest to re-target patches #1 and #3 to nf tree, I can do > this, just let me know.
It's fairly late, we're on -rc6 so I don't think it's a good idea to submit a large rework to -nf at this stage. > Alternative is to just add the nf_ct_frag6_consume_orig call to > openvswitch and handle that via net tree. > > I can then wait for that change to pop up in nf-next and just resend > this series (which will then undo that change). I'd rather get things fixes for the existing code. This would also allow simple passing back to -stable, then we can move forward discuss and review your rework with sufficient time. Let me know, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
