On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > > Sure, will try to debug. It looks like phydev->attached_dev is valid, but
> > > phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node is NULL.
> >
> > Humm
> >
> > phydev->attached_dev is a net_device, so should be the mac. What
> > device is phydev->attached_dev->dev? Is it not the dev embedded in the
> > platform_device passed to socfpga_dwmac_probe()?
> >
>
> Yes, it looks like it is, the dev->of_node is valid in socfpga_dwmac_probe(),
> but it looks like of_node is getting lost somewhere.
>
Do you know why this happening? In ksz9021_config_init():
@@ -345,7 +345,11 @@ static int ksz9021_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node)
of_node = phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node;
+ printk("%s %08x\n", __func__, phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node);
+ printk("%s %08x %08x\n", __func__, phydev->attached_dev->dev,
phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node);
[ 1.923311] ksz9021_config_init 00000000
[ 1.927224] ksz9021_config_init eedc0210 ee401680
The first printout shows phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node is NULL. but the
second printout, where I'm also printing out phydev->attached_dev->dev, then
phydev->attached_dev->dev.of_node is not NULL.
BR,
Dinh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
