On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 01:24:16PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 10/16/2015 12:38 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>>Maybe we need to walk up the hierarchy.
> >>>
> >>>Perhaps something like:
> >>>
> >>>const struct device *dev_walker;
> >>>
> >>>dev_walker = &phydev->dev;
> >>>do {
> >>> of_node = dev_walker->of_node;
> >>> dev_walker = dev_walker->parent;
> >>>} while (!of_node && dev_walker);
> >>>
> >>
> >>The above code seems to have fixed the issue.
> >
> >What i don't like about this is that it allows you to put these
> >properties in the mdio device node. These are phy properties, not mdio
> >properties....
>
> Yes, we know that the device tree is not correctly formed.
>
> You have a choice:
>
> A) Fix the device tree and any code that may have to change to work
> with a good device tree.
>
> B) Change the code to work with the screwy existing device tree.
> The above seems to work, other things may also be possible.
>
> I can't really make any decisions as to what the best way to proceed
> is, as I neither have the hardware in question, nor the time to work
> on it.
Hi hope Dinh will test with phydev->attached_dev->dev->of_node.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
