On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:58:31 -0700, Ronen Arad wrote:
> --- a/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ struct rtnl_af_ops {
> const struct nlattr *attr);
> int (*set_link_af)(struct net_device *dev,
> const struct nlattr *attr);
> + size_t (*get_link_af_size_filtered)(const struct
> net_device *dev,
> + u32
> ext_filter_mask);
> };
There's not much point in having two callbacks doing essentially the
same. Why you just don't add the new parameter to the existing
get_link_af_size? Looking at what the patch 3 does, the current
implementations of the callback can just ignore the new parameter and
bridge can remove the current br_get_link_af and rename
br_get_link_af_size_filtered to br_get_link_af.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
