On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:10:39PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:14:43AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:24:37PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > The conditional at the start of the function evaluates true, since
> > > 'rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PCPU' is non-zero.
> > Hi Phil, can you try the following patch and capture the dmesg output
> > to confirm the value of rt->rt6i_flags and the rt->dst.flags.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> >
> > --- a/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> > +++ b/include/net/ip6_fib.h
> > @@ -167,8 +167,15 @@ static inline void rt6_update_expires(struct rt6_info 
> > *rt0, int timeout)
> >
> >  static inline u32 rt6_get_cookie(const struct rt6_info *rt)
> >  {
> > -   if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PCPU || unlikely(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOCACHE))
> > +   if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_PCPU || unlikely(rt->dst.flags & DST_NOCACHE)) 
> > {
> >             rt = (struct rt6_info *)(rt->dst.from);
> > +           if (!rt)
> > +                   pr_err("rt6i_dst:%pI6c/%d rt6i_gateway:%pI6c "
> > +                          "rt6i_flags:%08X dst.flags:%08X\n",
> > +                          &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, rt->rt6i_dst.plen,
> > +                          &rt->rt6i_gateway, rt->rt6i_flags,
> > +                          rt->dst.flags);
> > +   }
> >
> >     return rt->rt6i_node ? rt->rt6i_node->fn_sernum : 0;
> >  }
>
> This code is not sane. Your pr_err() statement tries to dereference the
> NULL pointer in question. Are you interested in the originally passed
> rt6_info?
Good catch. sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to