On 2015-10-09 at 20:02:47 +0200, Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 12:50 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 20:42 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >>On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>As promised in last patch series, we implement a better SO_REUSEPORT
> >>>strategy, based on cpu affinities if selected by the application.
> >>>
> >>>We also moved sk_refcnt out of the cache line containing the lookup
> >>>keys, as it was considerably slowing down smp operations because
> >>>of false sharing. This was simpler than converting listen sockets
> >>>to conventional RCU (to avoid sk_refcnt dirtying)
> >>>
> >>>Could process 6.0 Mpps SYN instead of 4.2 Mpps on my test server.
> >>>
> >>Is this IPv4, IPv6, or some combination of the two ? :-)
> >
> >IPv4 only (mostly because I was using trafgen and its csumtcp() only
> >deals with IPv4 and I am lazy)
> 
> Agreed, will fix that in trafgen. ;) Thanks!

Daniel, I'd have som preliminary patches for trafgen ready to introduce
the csumudp6 and csumtcp6 trafgen helper functions (UDP/TCP checksum
using IPv6 pseudo headers). If you want I can push them after some
further testing later today.

Eric, would these to helpers be sufficient for your use case or do you
need any additional trafgen functionality?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to