From: Carol Soto <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:46:06 -0500
> > > On 10/6/2015 4:39 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:27 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> From: Carol L Soto <[email protected]> >>> >>> If we get MAX_MSIX interrupts would like to have each receive ring >>> with his own msix interrupt line. >> so 9293267a3e2a was only partially correct? and/or not fully optimal? >> please elaborate more on that in your change log. > just not fully optimal, with commit 9293267a3e2a if I have 64 MSIXs > and 2 ports I can get 8 rings for each port but then the rings will > share the interrupt lines. For 64 MSIXs we can have each ring with his > own interrupt line. > >>> Fixes: 9293267a3e2a ('net/mlx4_core: Capping number of requested MSIXs >>> to MAX_MSIX') >>> Signed-off-by: Carol L Soto <[email protected]> >> Carol, you didn't use net/mlx4: prefix as ask for mlx4 driver patch >> titles, so please repost, but before that I'd like to see an ack from >> Matan for this patch as well. > Sorry completely missed it. When Matan acks will resend it. Also please fix you subject to have a proper "mlx4: " subsystem prefix. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
