Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>> >>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future (like >>>> eBPF >>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the >>>> OF-DPA >>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut. >>>> >>>> v1->v2: >>>> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed >>>> >>>> Jiri Pirko (13): >>>> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten >>>> their names >>>> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h >>>> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c >>>> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files >>>> rocker: implement set settings mode command >>>> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure >>>> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton >>>> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove >>>> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to >>>> rocker_port_set_learning >>>> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init >>>> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function >>>> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of >>>> flags >>>> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file >>> >>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port >>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing. >>> >>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on >>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP >>>connectivity. I have this: >>> >>> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) >>> >>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using >>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I >>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru. >>> >>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git >>>bisect issues when running tests. Thanks. >> >> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks. > >Sorry, both tests are still broken. Would you send me your tests >scripts so I can see why your tests are passing?
I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
