Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:58:42PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:55:42PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:49:41PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >> >> >Are you referring here to messages of the EMAD protocol ? >> > >> >I know nothing about this protocol..... >> > >> >Does it at least use standard Ethernet framing? Source and Destination >> >header and an EtherType which mean EMAD? >> >> Yep, but that does not really matter. I believe we should find debugging >> interface which is protocol agnostic. Just arbitrary messages >> monitoring. > >Hi Jiri > >O.K, it is just that you mentioned wireshark. Passing the frames to >network interface taps would make this trivial.
That is true. But using netlink+nlmon would do the same. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
