On 10/02/2015 05:06 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: ...
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xe...@parallels.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com> --- This is in realtion to Tycho's latest patch set under [1]. The BPF handling is unfortunately not correct (triggering a crash on kernels that can set pages as ro).This patch here provides a minimal, simple interface from BPF API side as a possible step forward, so that the focus can then be on seccomp side wrt criu. F.e., dumping could happen similarly as in Pavel's sk_get_filter(). I have tested/based this against net-next, but have no issues whether Kees wants to take it, or whether it should go through both trees to reduce merge issues as once the case with 0fc174dea545 ("ebpf: make internal bpf API independent of CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL ifdefs").I'll send out a revised version of my set with Andy's comments later today and not include this patch. Let me know if I should do something differently.
Should be okay. Please make sure to describe in your cover letter that your series builds on top of ... http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/525492/ ... so that whoever takes the set eventually is aware of this. Thanks again, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
