On 09/30/2015 07:43 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> In order to cleanly unbind the dsa core, either as a module removal, >> or a platform device unbind, switch the allocation the their devm_ >> counterparts and complete the destroy functions. >> >> The last patch is an experimental way to exit the probe when no >> switch is found in the discover process. >> >> The patches are based on the current net-next. > > I looked at the patches and they bring DSA in a better direction. For > future submissions, could you CC people who recently worked on DSA, like > Andrew Lunn, Guenter Roeck, Vivien Didelot and myself? We can typically > give your patches a try fairly quickly. > > In case you are seriously considering making DSA a loadable module, > there were an earlier attempt here: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/345803 > > Thanks! > >> >> Neil Armstrong (3): >> net: dsa: Use devm_ prefixed allocations >> net: dsa: complete dsa_switch_destroy calls >> net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found >> >> net/dsa/dsa.c | 67 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> > > Hi All,
Thanks for the tests and reviews. My first intent is to make dynamic unbind/bind reliable, the reliable loadable module support is a more complex target, but starting with unbind is a simpler start. Should I re-post with the missing people, the Tested-by & without the RFC tag ? Regards, Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
