> On Sep 29, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer <[email protected]> wrote: > > @@ -728,8 +727,14 @@ static void ovs_fragment(struct vport *vport, struct > sk_buff *skb, u16 mru, > WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed fragment ->%s: eth=%04x, MRU=%d, MTU=%d.", > ovs_vport_name(vport), ntohs(ethertype), mru, > vport->dev->mtu); > - kfree_skb(skb); > + goto out; > } > + > + skb = NULL; > + > +out: > + if (skb) > + kfree_skb(skb); > } > > static void do_output(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, int out_port,
Wouldn't that hunk be better as:
@@ -728,8 +727,13 @@ static void ovs_fragment(struct vport *vport, struct
sk_buff *skb, u16 mru,
WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed fragment ->%s: eth=%04x, MRU=%d, MTU=%d.",
ovs_vport_name(vport), ntohs(ethertype), mru,
vport->dev->mtu);
- kfree_skb(skb);
+ goto out;
}
+
+ return;
+
+out:
+ kfree_skb(skb);
}
static void do_output(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, int out_port,
--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
