Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:55:48PM CEST, [email protected] wrote: >From: Scott Feldman <[email protected]> > >Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <[email protected]> >--- > include/linux/if_bridge.h | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h >index dad8b00..6cc6dbc 100644 >--- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h >+++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h >@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ struct br_ip_list { > #define BR_LEARNING_SYNC BIT(9) > #define BR_PROXYARP_WIFI BIT(10) > >+/* values as per ieee8021QBridgeFdbAgingTime */ >+#define BR_MIN_AGEING_TIME (10 * HZ) >+#define BR_MAX_AGEING_TIME (1000000 * HZ)
I think that a bridge patch checking against these values should be introduced along with these values, in the same patchset -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
