Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:55:48PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>From: Scott Feldman <sfel...@gmail.com>
>
>Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfel...@gmail.com>
>---
> include/linux/if_bridge.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>index dad8b00..6cc6dbc 100644
>--- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>+++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
>@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ struct br_ip_list {
> #define BR_LEARNING_SYNC BIT(9)
> #define BR_PROXYARP_WIFI BIT(10)
>
>+/* values as per ieee8021QBridgeFdbAgingTime */
>+#define BR_MIN_AGEING_TIME (10 * HZ)
>+#define BR_MAX_AGEING_TIME (1000000 * HZ)
I think that a bridge patch checking against these values should be
introduced along with these values, in the same patchset
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
