Petr Cvek <petr.c...@tul.cz> writes: >> Should have been posted to linux arm kernel mailing list, unless my mailer >> failed ... >> > Searching for: > > "ARM: pxa: add resources to pxaficp_ir" > > did not found anything, same was for "ficp" in the > linux-arm-kernel/netdev/linux-kernel > mailing list archive. Ah ok, I'll resend it then.
>>> BTW This patch required update of my kernel repo. It seems that my: >>> >>> magician.c patches + ficp patch + new dma engine >>> >>> does not work for me at all. Kernel throws some panic about interrupts and >>> then >>> it ends in an infinite stack dumping loop. Fault occurs before rootfs is >>> mounted, so probably around MMC init (with removed SD card it fails normally >>> with no rootfs found error). >> Could you send me (privately) the stack you're getting please. This is >> something >> I'd like to catch up early in the -rc releases. > > Well this will be problem as I cannot save anything to an SD card after and > during the failure. Only viable interfaces would be earlycon on an infraport > or high speed camera on LCD :-). Ah just as on my mioa701. I ended up soldering a JTAG cable :) > But I was able to revert this commit: > > 6464b71409511939efce1ae4fb4ec6e3483b11b2 mmc: pxamci: switch > over to dmaengine use > > and after that I am able to boot. Okay. I'll try to reproduce this failure then. If I fail, well, before using the JTAG cable, I used another trick: I was taking a movie from the LCD with a smartphone, and it worked. It was an horrible thing to decrypt ... Let's hope I'll be lucky on one of my platforms. >> Now with your stack, could you also give me the upstream commit id of the >> tip of >> the tree you're using (before your patches) please ? > > It is probably irelevant now, but for complete information: > > Discovered on my working repo: mainline > b8889c4fc6ba03e289cec6a4d692f6f080a55e53 > Still present on fresh downloaded: linux-next > 22dc312d56ba077db27a9798b340e7d161f1df05 Ok, thanks. >> And it is true I have not tested the rootfs special case, where drivers are >> not >> yet initialized (and more specifically gpio and interrupt chip). Your >> backtrace >> should tell me if you fall into this category of issues ... but I digress, >> this >> has no link with pxaficp. > > Should I start new thread? (same bug can be present in the FICP too) Yes, this pxamci bothers me, it deserves a thread. > I will try to configure an initrd rootfs this should create more ways to save > kernel log. Great idea. > > Anyway after mmc dma revert I was still not able to start FICP. There is an > error: > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 32e00004 > > from pxa_irda_startup() and it seems it is caused by register definitions. > For example: > > writel_relaxed((val), (irda)->stuart_base + (off)); > > is called by > > stuart_writel(si, 0, STIER); > > but STIER is not just an offset, but full register address: > > __REG(0x40700004) > > So the definition should be changed, unless there is another patch I did not > received (in that case, send me full patchset again please) :-). Agreed, this is a bug in this patch. With this fix, is the pxaficp working or do you need a bit more time to experiment ? Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
