On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:00:36 +0000
Matthias Tafelmeier <matthias.tafelme...@gmx.net> wrote:
> >> +#define STATIC_ASSERT(COND, MSG) \
> >> +{ \
> >> + char STATIC_ASSERT##MSG[(COND) ? 1 : -1]; \
> >> + (void)STATIC_ASSERT##MSG[0]; \
> >> +}
> >
> > If you are going to introduce this, please use same convention
> > as Linux kernel. ie. BUILD_BUG_ON()
> >
> > Your code looks like it came out of some other project.
> >
>
> Well, but when using "BUILD_BUG_ON()" I would have to give up on having
> put out the MSG by compiler when a static issue occurs. I liked that notion.
If it won't compile, people will look at the code. The message is really
irrelevant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
