On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:56:36PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > you suggest or not), for two reasons: I think (will start experimenting > more with it tomorrow), you would get an out of bounds access here in > case the skb->data is the last slot in the ring buffer and reaches > exactly to the ring buffer end. And (despite that), it's also hard
I thought accessing as a value, not a pointer, in thats wrong shared info will not be a big problem, but > to maintain - the next one adding a new shared info member will very > likely oversee this special case in netlink here, thus the issue would > then simply be reintroduced over and over. I agree with you. Thank you for taking your time. I think I have learned a lot. Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
