On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:42:00PM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > I look a closer look at dst_rcu_free() and your commit pointers. I can see > your point > for DST_NOCACHE. > > However, dst_free() for not DST_NOCACHE is still an issue, I think. oops. Ignore this email and continue the discussion in my last email instead.
For DST_NOCACHE, dst_release() is doing call_rcu(dst_destroy_rcu) and dst_destroy_rcu() is directly calling dst_destroy(). I was confused dst_rcu_free() was used instead.... time for a break towards the end of the day :p -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
