On 08/29/2015 10:59 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Please note that similar overhead was also reported while creating
> veth pairs  https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/19/556


That got me curious, so I took the veth pair creation script from there, and started running it out to 10K pairs, comparing a 3.14.44 kernel with a 4.2.0-rc4+ from net-next and then net-next after pulling to get the snmp stat aggregation perf change (4.2.0-rc8+).

Indeed, the 4.2.0-rc8+ kernel with the change was faster than the 4.2.0-rc4+ kernel without it, but both were slower than the 3.14.44 kernel.

I've put a spreadsheet with the results at:

ftp://ftp.netperf.org/vethpair/vethpair_compare.ods

A perf top for the 4.20-rc8+ kernel from the net-next tree looks like this out around 10K pairs:

PerfTop: 11155 irqs/sec kernel:94.2% exact: 0.0% [4000Hz cycles], (all, 32 CPUs)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    23.44%  [kernel]       [k] vsscanf
     7.32%  [kernel]       [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.isra.4
     5.63%  [kernel]       [k] __memcpy
     5.27%  [kernel]       [k] __dev_alloc_name
     3.46%  [kernel]       [k] format_decode
     3.44%  [kernel]       [k] vsnprintf
     3.16%  [kernel]       [k] acpi_os_write_port
     2.71%  [kernel]       [k] number.isra.13
     1.50%  [kernel]       [k] strncmp
     1.21%  [kernel]       [k] _parse_integer
     0.93%  [kernel]       [k] filemap_map_pages
     0.82%  [kernel]       [k] put_dec_trunc8
     0.82%  [kernel]       [k] unmap_single_vma
     0.78%  [kernel]       [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
     0.71%  [kernel]       [k] menu_select
     0.65%  [kernel]       [k] clear_page
     0.64%  [kernel]       [k] _raw_spin_lock
     0.62%  [kernel]       [k] page_fault
     0.60%  [kernel]       [k] find_busiest_group
     0.53%  [kernel]       [k] snprintf
     0.52%  [kernel]       [k] int_sqrt
     0.46%  [kernel]       [k] simple_strtoull
     0.44%  [kernel]       [k] page_remove_rmap

My attempts to get a call-graph have been met with very limited success. Even though I've installed the dbg package from "make deb-pkg" the symbol resolution doesn't seem to be working.

happy benchmarking,

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to