Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> writes:
> Vivek Kumar Bhagat <vivek.bha...@samsung.com> writes:
>
>> @@ -1906,7 +1908,8 @@ static int __usbnet_read_cmd(struct usbnet *dev, u8
>> cmd, u8 reqtype,
>> buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!buf)
>> goto out;
>> - }
>> + } else
>> + goto out;
>>
>> err = usb_control_msg(dev->udev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0),
>> cmd, reqtype, value, index, buf, size,
>
>
> This is also wrong. It makes __usbnet_read_cmd() return -ENOMEM if
> called with a NULL data pointer. I don't know if it is used, but it's
> perfectly valid to call __usbnet_read_cmd() with data == NULL if
> size == 0. No memcpy will happen in this case because usb_control_msg
> can only return 0 or an error
Just for the record - a simple grep for usbnet_read_cmd shows that at
least drivers/net/usb/plusb.c depends on the current behaviour:
static inline int
pl_vendor_req(struct usbnet *dev, u8 req, u8 val, u8 index)
{
return usbnet_read_cmd(dev, req,
USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_VENDOR |
USB_RECIP_DEVICE,
val, index, NULL, 0);
}
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
