2015-07-29 10:14 GMT+08:00 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>: >>>> May be we use a “hop limit range" instead? How do you think? >>> >>> I think name of sysctl is the same as you suggested and change the >>> semantics. default value is 0 to accept all hotlimit value >>> as before and people can set it to 32 (for example) to reject >>> too-small hoplimit (0-31). >> >> OK, then I will try submit a "minimum hop limit", thanks for your suggestion >> :) > > accept_ra_min_hop_limit would be better as we have > accept_ra_rt_info_max_plen. > Opps, I missed this mail and send a [PATCH] net/ipv6: add sysctl option min_hop_limit... I will send a [PATCHv3] net/ipv6: add sysctl option accept_ra_min_hop_limit as this patch's follow up. Sorry for the version confusion.
Thanks Hangbin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
