Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:11:46PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> By maintining a set of functions to register and unregister netfilter
>> hooks both globally and per network namespace I have managed to write a
>> compact patchset that maintain per network netfilter chains, and
>> registers the nftables netfilter hooks per network namespace.
>
> Nice, thank you.
>
> It would be great to convert this to the for_each_net_rcu variant once
> we're sure this is safe.
That seems reasonable.
>> There are lots of other possible and desirable cleanups but this one is
>> a core change needed to make the other changes independent small
>> changes.
>
> The state->net field will kill that dev_net(...) ? x : y; all over the
> code, that would be nice.
Yes it will. I intend to do that after this patchset settles so I am
not dealing with more than one issue at a time. Otherwise there
is too much work at once.
> Some comments on your patchset:
>
> * 1/6 netfilter: nf_queue: Don't recompute the hook_list head
>
> I already passed this to current nf as you insisted on getting this,
> and for the sake of correctness, so it's basically already in David's
> net tree.
I would have expected this patch to be somewhere. I did not see
this change in net-next when I wrote the patchset (which seemed
like a good approximation of the latest thing available). If I
overlooked and the patch has already made it to Dave then my apologies
for being redundant.
I still don't see this patch in your pending branch.
Am I missing something?
> * From 2 to 6, I have applied these series with small coding style
> cleanups.
>
> - Add line break between variable declaration and body:
>
> + struct list_head *nf_hook_list = &nf_hooks[pf][hook];
> -+
> + if (nf_hook_list_active(nf_hook_list, pf, hook)) {
>
> and here:
>
> int nft_register_basechain(struct nft_base_chain *basechain,
> unsigned int hook_nops)
> {
> + struct net *net = read_pnet(&basechain->pnet);
> ++
>
> - Get rid of unnecessary parens:
>
> -+ if ((reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV) && (reg->hooknum ==
> NF_NETDEV_INGRESS))
> ++ if (reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV && reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS)
Fair enough. For me those parens are necessary to trust the compiler is
doing the right thing. I can never remember the C operator precedence
rules.
> - Get rid of unnecesary brackets:
>
> -+ for_each_net(net) {
> ++ for_each_net(net)
> + nf_unregister_net_hook(net, reg);
> -+ }
>
> and here:
>
> -+ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(elem, &nf_hook_list, list) {
> ++ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(elem, &nf_hook_list, list)
> + nf_unregister_net_hook(net, elem);
> -+ }
>
> I have pushed this to:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git/log/?h=pending
>
> in case you want to have a closer look. Thank you.
Thank you.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
