Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:36:55PM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote: >On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:58:34AM CEST, jblu...@infradead.org wrote: >>>The code in net/ipv6/addrconf.c:addrconf_notify() tests for IFF_SLAVE to >>>decide if it should start the address configuration. Since team ports >>>shouldn't get link-local addresses assigned lets set IFF_SLAVE when linking >>>a port to the team master. >> >> I don't want to use IFF_SLAVE in team. Other master-slave devices are >> not using that as well, for example bridge, ovs, etc. >> > >Maybe they need to get fixed too. I've used that flag because it is >documented as >a "slave of a load balancer" which describes what a team port is. > > >> I think that this should be fixed in addrconf_notify. It should lookup >> if there is a master on top and bail out in that case. > >There are other virtual interfaces that have a master assigned and want to >participate in IPv6 address configuration.
Can you give me an example? > >Unless we want to have a cascade of conditionals testing the priv_flags in >addrconf_notify() this is asking for a new net_device_flags flag. >Maybe something >generic like IFF_L2PORT ? > >Thanks, >Jan > >[ Jiri, sorry for getting that mail twice ] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
