Hi Andrew, ----- On Jul 8, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Andrew Lunn and...@lunn.ch wrote:
>> I understand. However this whole VLAN thing represents a lot of code. >> Some other work depends on portions of it. Do you think it'd be OK if I >> resend the patch 1/3 alone? Having only the VTU operations and "vtu" >> debugfs file does not break the actual behavior, and will lighten up the >> following patchsets. > > It might be a bit early for that. All the previous versions of 1/3 > have had issues with number of ports. I've not had time to take a > close look to see if there are other problems. > > If somebody else does a proper review and says its O.K, them i'm > O.K. with that. But until that happens, i don't think it should go in. > > Andrew OK, then I'll send right away smaller debugfs patches that I need. Hopefully you'll have time to review it before your holidays ;-) Also, I'll resend the VTU debugfs support later then. Thanks, -v -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
