On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 3cfff2a..41ec022 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -4398,7 +4398,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_skb_with_frags(unsigned long
> > header_len,
> >
> > while (order) {
> > if (npages >= 1 << order) {
> > - page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask |
> > + page = alloc_pages((gfp_mask & ~__GFP_WAIT) |
> > __GFP_COMP |
> > __GFP_NOWARN |
> > __GFP_NORETRY,
>
> Note that __GFP_NORETRY is weaker than ~__GFP_WAIT and thus redundant. But it
> won't hurt anything leaving it there. And you might consider __GFP_NO_KSWAPD
> instead, as I said in the other thread.
>
Yeah, I agreed with __GFP_NO_KSWAPD to avoid utilizing memory reserves for
this.
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index 292f422..e9855a4 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct
> > page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t gfp)
> >
> > pfrag->offset = 0;
> > if (SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER) {
> > - pfrag->page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_COMP |
> > + pfrag->page = alloc_pages((gfp & ~__GFP_WAIT) | __GFP_COMP |
> > __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
> > SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER);
> > if (likely(pfrag->page)) {
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
