Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:39:38 +0000 From: "bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org> To: "shemmin...@linux-foundation.org" <shemmin...@linux-foundation.org> Subject: [Bug 99461] New: recvfrom SYSCALL infinite loop/deadlock chewing 100% CPU [was __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=300, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6042880600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99461 Bug ID: 99461 Summary: recvfrom SYSCALL infinite loop/deadlock chewing 100% CPU [was __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=300, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6042880600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33] Product: Networking Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 3.13.0 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P1 Component: Other Assignee: shemmin...@linux-foundation.org Reporter: d...@censornet.com Regression: No This is a repost of a bug I reported initially to the GNU libc bug list (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18493). I was advised by Andreas Schwab that __libc_recv function is just a thin wrapper around the recvfrom system call, and to report this to "the kernel people", which I assume is you people. Here's a summary of the problem: In a multi-threaded pthreads process running on Ubuntu 14.04 AMD64 (with over 1000 threads) which uses real time FIFO scheduling, we occasionally see calls to recv() with flags (MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL) get stuck in an infinte loop or deadlock meaning the threads lock up chewing as much CPU as they can (due to FIFO scheduling) while stuck inside recv(). Here's an example gdb back trace: [Switching to thread 4 (Thread 0x7f6040546700 (LWP 27251))] #0 0x00007f6231d2f7eb in __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=146, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6040543600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33 33 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f6231d2f7eb in __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=146, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6040543600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33 #1 0x0000000000421945 in recv (__flags=258, __n=5, __buf=0x7f6040543600, __fd=146) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/socket2.h:44 [snip] The socket is a TCP socket in blocking mode, the recv() call is inside an outer loop with a counter, and I've checked the counter with gdb and it's always at 1, meaning that I'm sure that the outer loop isn't the problem, the thread is indeed deadlocked inside the recv() internals. Other nodes: * There always seems to be 2 or more threads deadlocked in the same place (same recv() call but with distinct FDs) * The threads calling recv() have cancellation disbaled by previously executing: thread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, NULL); I've even tried adding a poll() call for POLLRDNORM on the socket before calling recv() with MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL flags to try to make sure there's data available on the socket before calling *recv()*, but it makes no difference. So, I don't know what is wrong here, I've read all the recv() documentation and believe that recv() is being used correctly, the only conclusion I can come to is that there is a bug in libc recv() when using flags MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL with thousands of pthreads running. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
