On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dich...@6wind.com> wrote:
> Le 09/06/2015 16:21, David Ahern a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Nicolas:
>>
>> On 6/9/15 2:58 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not really in favor of the name 'vrf'. This term is very
>>> controversial and
>>> having a consensus of what is/contains a 'vrf' is quite impossible.
>>> There was already a lot of discussions about this topic on quagga ml
>>> that show
>>> that everybody has a different opinion about this term ;-)
>>
>>
>> Are you referring to this thread?
>> https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2014-November/011795.html
>
> No, there were recent discussions on quagga about that subject. Here is some
> non-exhaustive pointers:
> https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-May/012581.html
> https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-May/012630.html
> https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-June/012715.html
>
> Note the last pointer also explains why it was called MRF by Cumulus.
>
>

Agreed, I used the term VRF for this series to make sure we had the
right context, but clearly MRF is a term we are happier to use ..

> Regards,
> Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to