On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Cong Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Sorin Dumitru <[email protected]> wrote: >> We're seeing some softlockups from this function when there >> are a lot fdb entries on a vxlan device. Taking the lock for >> each bucket instead of the whole table is enough to fix that. >> > > Hmm, then the spinlock could be moved into each bucket, right?
Yes, it could, but I'm not sure if it will benefit us too much. I didn't see too much contention on this lock while adding and removing fdb entries. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
