On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Dominick Grift <dac.overr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 07:53:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> >> Hi Dominick >> >> Have you tried this patch I sent last monday ? >> >> I will submit formally when I get a test result. >> >> Thanks > > Eric, > > I have tested the below patch and everything is in order! > > Thank you! > >> >> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c >> index >> 4fcaa67750fda845ad0a180332c4cd96a9524086..7caf7fae2d5b8aa369b924e1c87a47c343fb8954 >> 100644 >> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c >> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c >> @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@ static void br_forward_delay_timer_expired(unsigned long >> arg) >> netif_carrier_on(br->dev); >> } >> br_log_state(p); >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, p); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> spin_unlock(&br->lock); >> } >> >> >>
I'm still seeing this with Linus' tree as of yesterday. Is this queued anywhere for 4.1? josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
