This action is meant to be passive, i.e. we should not alter
skb->nfct: If nfct is present just leave it alone.
Compile tested only.
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
---
shouldn't matter much in practice since this would be used in the
ingress path where skb->nfct is NULL in non-lo case.
diff --git a/net/sched/act_connmark.c b/net/sched/act_connmark.c
index 8e47251..295d14b 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_connmark.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_connmark.c
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ static int tcf_connmark(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct
tc_action *a,
skb->mark = c->mark;
/* using overlimits stats to count how many packets marked */
ca->tcf_qstats.overlimits++;
- nf_ct_put(c);
goto out;
}
@@ -82,7 +81,6 @@ static int tcf_connmark(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct
tc_action *a,
nf_ct_put(c);
out:
- skb->nfct = NULL;
spin_unlock(&ca->tcf_lock);
return ca->tcf_action;
}
--
2.0.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
