On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:45 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > That would break iptables compilation, which already includes > linux/in.h in some files. I guess the best fix for now is to > include netinet/in.h in busybox and long-term clean this up > properly.
Yeah, that makes sense. Can we push the change to __u32 (or uint32_t) for 2.6.24? Or is there something obvious we should be doing in busybox which we aren't? I don't quite understand why this u_int32_t crap doesn't work at _all_ when it evidently used to at least in some environments. -- dwmw2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
