David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:43:05 -0800 (PST)

I think we can fix this easily by using __attribute_const_
on the print_mac() declaration.  Let me play with that.

Actually it seems the 'pure' attribute is more important
here.  Although it's not semantically a perfect match,
what we need to tell the compiler is basically that:

1) the return value depends upon the inputs
2) if the input is not used, it's safe to avoid the call

and 'pure' accomplishes that without any unwanted side-effects.

I think this will not result in any unwanted over-optimization.
Because if the inputs change in any way GCC has to emit the
call.

Any objections?


This seems fine to me, thanks Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to