On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 11:58:27PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>       What's going on with XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq?  Almost all users
> expect it to be u32 (feeding it to htonl()), except xfrm_input().
> That one expects __be32 in there - check what it does to seq and
> you'll see.  Moreover, it updates the sucker in a way that makes
> sense only for __be32.

My bad.

>       a) are we just missing ntohl() and htonl() in obvious places
> in xfrm_input()?

It's semantically correct.  However, my mistake that I'm mixing the
input sequence number which is network endian with the output sequence
number which is host endian (and 64-bit).

>       b) WTF is it declared as 64bit, anyway?

For extended sequence numbers which we'll support soon (I hope).

[IPSEC]: Fix bogus usage of u64 on input sequence number

Al Viro spotted a bogus use of u64 on the input sequence number which
is big-endian.  This patch fixes it by giving the input sequence number
its own member in the xfrm_skb_cb structure.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index ac72116..eea7785 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -508,7 +508,10 @@ struct xfrm_skb_cb {
         } header;
 
         /* Sequence number for replay protection. */
-        u64 seq;
+       union {
+               u64 output;
+               __be32 input;
+       } seq;
 };
 
 #define XFRM_SKB_CB(__skb) ((struct xfrm_skb_cb *)&((__skb)->cb[0]))
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ah4.c b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
index 9d4555e..8219b7e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ah4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ah4.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int ah_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
 
        ah->reserved = 0;
        ah->spi = x->id.spi;
-       ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
        err = ah_mac_digest(ahp, skb, ah->auth_data);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 258d176..091e670 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int esp_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        }
 
        esph->spi = x->id.spi;
-       esph->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       esph->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        sg_init_table(sg, nfrags);
        skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ static int esp_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        aead_givcrypt_set_callback(req, 0, esp_output_done, skb);
        aead_givcrypt_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, clen, iv);
        aead_givcrypt_set_assoc(req, asg, sizeof(*esph));
-       aead_givcrypt_set_giv(req, esph->enc_data, XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       aead_givcrypt_set_giv(req, esph->enc_data,
+                             XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        ESP_SKB_CB(skb)->tmp = tmp;
        err = crypto_aead_givencrypt(req);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ah6.c b/net/ipv6/ah6.c
index 379c8e0..2ff0c82 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ah6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ah6.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int ah6_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
 
        ah->reserved = 0;
        ah->spi = x->id.spi;
-       ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       ah->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
        err = ah_mac_digest(ahp, skb, ah->auth_data);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/esp6.c b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
index 8e0f142..0ec1402 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/esp6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/esp6.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int esp6_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        *skb_mac_header(skb) = IPPROTO_ESP;
 
        esph->spi = x->id.spi;
-       esph->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       esph->seq_no = htonl(XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        sg_init_table(sg, nfrags);
        skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg,
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ static int esp6_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        aead_givcrypt_set_callback(req, 0, esp_output_done, skb);
        aead_givcrypt_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, clen, iv);
        aead_givcrypt_set_assoc(req, asg, sizeof(*esph));
-       aead_givcrypt_set_giv(req, esph->enc_data, XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+       aead_givcrypt_set_giv(req, esph->enc_data,
+                             XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output);
 
        ESP_SKB_CB(skb)->tmp = tmp;
        err = crypto_aead_givencrypt(req);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 4d6ebc6..62188c6 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 
spi, int encap_type)
        if (encap_type < 0) {
                async = 1;
                x = xfrm_input_state(skb);
-               seq = XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
+               seq = XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.input;
                goto resume;
        }
 
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 
spi, int encap_type)
 
                spin_unlock(&x->lock);
 
-               XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = seq;
+               XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.input = seq;
 
                nexthdr = x->type->input(x, skb);
 
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
index fc69036..569d377 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int xfrm_output_one(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)
                }
 
                if (x->type->flags & XFRM_TYPE_REPLAY_PROT) {
-                       XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = ++x->replay.oseq;
+                       XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output = ++x->replay.oseq;
                        if (unlikely(x->replay.oseq == 0)) {
                                XFRM_INC_STATS(LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTSTATESEQERROR);
                                x->replay.oseq--;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to