On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 17:16 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > Drivers like eHEA need memory notifiers in order to > update their internal DMA memory map when memory is added > to or removed from the system. > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > Comment: eHEA patches that exploit these functions will follow > > > drivers/base/memory.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c > index 7ae413f..1e1bd4c 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/memory.c > +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c > @@ -52,11 +52,13 @@ int register_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) > { > return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&memory_chain, nb); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_memory_notifier); > > void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) > { > blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&memory_chain, nb); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_memory_notifier); > > /* > * register_memory - Setup a sysfs device for a memory block
Is there a reason for not making them EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() ? Otherwise, looks good to me. I have been planning to send this as part of my next update with ppc64 arch-specific remove support and generic __remove_pages() support. If this is blocking your work, lets get this in. Acked-by: Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Badari -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html