David Miller wrote:
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:59:57 -0800

net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c: In function 'sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack':
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:484: warning: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this 
function

It is not obvious that this is a false positive.

I'll check in the following for now.

Vlad, please take a look.

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index b126751..6e12757 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(const struct 
sctp_endpoint *ep,
        sctp_init_chunk_t *initchunk;
        struct sctp_chunk *err_chunk;
        struct sctp_packet *packet;
-       sctp_error_t error;
+       sctp_error_t error = SCTP_ERROR_NO_ERROR;
if (!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk, asoc))
                return sctp_sf_pdiscard(ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);


Hi David

We can do that, or move the declaration to the only block that uses it.
Like this:

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index f02ce3d..193c0c2 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -442,7 +442,6 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(const struct 
sctp_endpoint *ep,
        sctp_init_chunk_t *initchunk;
        struct sctp_chunk *err_chunk;
        struct sctp_packet *packet;
-       sctp_error_t error;

        if (!sctp_vtag_verify(chunk, asoc))
                return sctp_sf_pdiscard(ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
@@ -466,6 +465,7 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(const struct 
sctp_endpoint *ep,
        if (!sctp_verify_init(asoc, chunk->chunk_hdr->type,
                              (sctp_init_chunk_t *)chunk->chunk_hdr, chunk,
                              &err_chunk)) {
+               sctp_error_t error;

                SCTP_INC_STATS(SCTP_MIB_ABORTEDS);

-vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to