On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:25:02 -0800
Jay Vosburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Fix the handling of rtnl and the bonding_rwsem to always be acquired
> in a consistent order (rtnl, then bonding_rwsem).
> 
> The existing code sometimes acquired them in this order, and sometimes
> in the opposite order, which opens a window for deadlock between ifenslave
> and sysfs.
> 
> ...
>
>  int bond_create(char *name, struct bond_params *params, struct bonding 
> **newbond)
>  {
>       struct net_device *bond_dev;
> +     struct bonding *bond, *nxt;
>       int res;
>  
>       rtnl_lock();
> +     down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
> +
> +     /* Check to see if the bond already exists. */
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(bond, nxt, &bond_dev_list, bond_list)

this could (should) use list_for_each_entry().

> +             if (strnicmp(bond->dev->name, name, IFNAMSIZ) == 0) {
> +                     printk(KERN_ERR DRV_NAME
> +                            ": cannot add bond %s; it already exists\n",
> +                            name);
> +                     res = -EPERM;
> +                     goto out_rtnl;
> +             }
> +
>       bond_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
>                               ether_setup);
>       if (!bond_dev) {
> @@ -4915,10 +4928,12 @@ int bond_create(char *name, struct bond_params 
> *params, struct bonding **newbond
>  
>       netif_carrier_off(bond_dev);
>  
> +     up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
>       rtnl_unlock(); /* allows sysfs registration of net device */
>       res = bond_create_sysfs_entry(bond_dev->priv);
>       if (res < 0) {
>               rtnl_lock();
> +             down_write(&bonding_rwsem);
>               goto out_bond;
>       }
>  
> @@ -4929,6 +4944,7 @@ out_bond:
>  out_netdev:
>       free_netdev(bond_dev);
>  out_rtnl:
> +     up_write(&bonding_rwsem);
>       rtnl_unlock();
>       return res;
>  }
> @@ -4949,6 +4965,9 @@ static int __init bonding_init(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>       bond_create_proc_dir();
>  #endif
> +
> +     init_rwsem(&bonding_rwsem);

It would be better to initialise this at compile time with DECLARE_RWSEM().


But neither of those things need to be done for 2.6.24.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to