Jarek Poplawski wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote, On 01/15/2008 05:05 PM:

Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:

...

Yes, packets in the old qdisc are lost.

Maybe if tc do changes - need create second queue (hash of rules or how you named it?) and do changes at it. Then replace old queue rules by created new.
Logic -
1. Do snapshot
2. Do changes in shapshot
3. All new packets go to snapshot
4. If old queue not have packets - delete it.
5. Snapshot its default.

That doesn't really work since qdiscs keep internal state that
in large parts depends on the packets queued. Take the qlen as
a simple example, the new qdisc doesn't know about the packets
in the old one and will exceed the limit.

But, some similar alternative to killing packets 'to death' could
be imagined, I suppose (in the future, of course!). So, e.g. doing
the switch automatically after last packet has been dequeued (maybe
even with some 'special' function/mode for this). After all even
with accuracy lost, it could be less visible for clients than
current way?


This would need support from the qdiscs to do it properly. Looks
non-trivial for HTB/HFSC/CBQ, but the others shouldn't be that hard.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to