From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:23:37 -0500
> On Friday 11 January 2008, David Miller wrote: > > From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Seems the most logical thing to do would be to break out the small > > > portion that everyone wants into <linux/sockaddr.h> or somesuch, and > > > then remove those ifdefs entirely. > > > > > > Proposed patch (still being tested) attached... > > > > I think this would clearly break existing glibc builds. > > > > I agree with fixing the ifdef checks, but not like this. > > how ? the large crap in linux/socket.h never made it into glibc builds, and > the few things at the top which were relocated to linux/sockaddr.h are still > pulled in via linux/socket.h. for glibc, the resulting '#include > <linux/socket.h>' should be unchanged. Hmmm... Doesn't glibc include linux/socket.h? If so, before it wouldn't get the sa_family_t et al. defines (because __GLIBC__ will be defined and it will be >= 2), but with your change it get those things. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
