Move an ASSERT_RTNL down to where we should hold only RTNL;
the existing check produces spurious warnings because we hold additional
locks at _bh, tripping a debug warning in spin_lock_mutex().
Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 25b8dbf..9b55a12 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -1601,9 +1601,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond,
struct slave *new_slave
struct slave *swap_slave;
int i;
- if (new_slave)
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) {
return;
}
@@ -1649,6 +1646,8 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond,
struct slave *new_slave
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
read_unlock(&bond->lock);
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
/* curr_active_slave must be set before calling alb_swap_mac_addr */
if (swap_slave) {
/* swap mac address */
--
1.5.3.4.206.g58ba4-dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
