From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:13:57 -0500
> On Thursday 03 January 2008 6:05:18 pm David Miller wrote: > > From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:20:06 -0500 > > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 4:13:12 pm Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:15:34AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > While I'm at it, is there some reason for this #define in > > > > > __skb_clone()? > > > > > > > > > > #define C(x) n->x = skb->x > > > > > > > > > > ... it seems kinda silly to me and I tend to think the code > > > > > would be better without it. > > > > > > > > IMHO, if there are a lot of this, it's definitely more readable: > > > > easier to check which values are simply copied and which need > > > > something more. But, as usual, it's probably a question of taste, > > > > and of course without it it would definitely look classier... > > > > > > For me personally, I would argue the readability bit. > > > > I definitely think the C() thing is more readable. > > > > Less typing, less reading... > > Well, you're the boss :) I just put the C() macro back in, but I kept > the reordering that was suggested to help reduce cacheline bounces > since that still makes sense to me. The function now looks like this: Looks ok to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
