Prio is limited. I can have on PPPoE up to 500-600 customers, and i need to create for each in ifb device class/qdisc. So prio will not fit.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:18:27 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:44:17AM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > .... > > For bandwidth sharing it is perfect, but i want just to make things, which i > > did with TBF - some time bursty speed, and then slow down to lower speed if > > customer is using too much. In theory it has to work like this, but in > > practice i am hitting wall. I tried it about 1 year ago, it was same thing, > > just with another conditions. Seems cburst/burst a bit different thing, just > > to make load on CPU by HTB less , at high speeds. > > IMHO it's quite possible you're trying to use HTB to things it is > not intended to do. cburst/burst have to limit burstiness and not > change rates depending on load. But, maybe they could do the other > things too whith some tricks, I don't know. I think CBQ or maybe > HFSC could be better for you. But, if TBF works for you, and you > don't need sharing (lending) I don't understand why to 'fight' > with HTB at all. You could maybe use it only to get class hierarchy > with some high, not limiting rates, or even try e.g. prio + TBF > combination. > > Regards, > Jarek P. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Denys Fedoryshchenko Technical Manager Virtual ISP S.A.L. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
