From: Masakazu Mokuno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:51:49 +0900

>       Hi
> 
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:58:08 -0800 (PST)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -520,7 +530,7 @@ iwe_stream_add_point(char *     stream,         /* 
> > Stream of events */
> >             memcpy(stream + IW_EV_LCP_LEN,
> >                    ((char *) iwe) + IW_EV_LCP_LEN + IW_EV_POINT_OFF,
> >                    IW_EV_POINT_PK_LEN - IW_EV_LCP_PK_LEN);
> 
> As the alignment of 64bit platforms may be defferent from 32bit one,
> should it be like the following?

IW_EV_LCP_LEN is the same on both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms, it is
just the size of the "len" and "cmd" portions of struct iw_event.

Those are both __u16, so IW_EV_LCP_LEN always evaluates to "4",
try it if you do not believe me. :-)

The iwreq_data size is invariant across the calculations.
If it's bigger on 64-bit, more will be subtracted in the
calculation performed by IW_EV_LCP_LEN.

So my patches are correct as-is and we do not need to
be mindful of compat'ness wrt. IW_EV_LCP_LEN.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to