From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:14:15 -0800

> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:23:35 +0100
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Someone will argue that you should use header-y +=
> > because the file has no conditionals removed by unifdef.
> > 
> > My personal opinion is that we should kill header-y and
> > I had patches to greatly improve all this but they got 
> > lost by accident and I have not yet redone them.
> > 
> >     Sam
> 
> Someone might add kernel code later...

I doubt it, I'll therefore modify your patch to use
header-y for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to